Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2009
Re: do SUBROUTINE(LIST)
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Paul LeoNerd Evans
Date:
November 2, 2009 05:01
Subject:
Re: do SUBROUTINE(LIST)
Message ID:
20091102130136.GD27075@cel.leo
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:21:36AM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> 3: The solution in 5.10.1 (to make -C processing work like -T processing)
> gives 90% of the benefit, without hitting those corner cases.
Oh, yes. And to be honest, I'm quite happy with this 90% solution - the
exec() and the shebang ought to match anyway, so for normal +x'ed perl
scripts, it all works fine.
I was simply offering a counter-argument to the original suggestion that
perl has never broken back-compat before..
--
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
leonerd@leonerd.org.uk
ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next