Abigail wrote: > If we want '\w+' to be able to match Klingon "words", why shouldn't \d+ > match Klingon numbers? Yes, \d+ matches digits from different scripts, > but \w+ matches word characters from different scripts as well. > > Now, don't consider this an argument in favour of having \w match non-ASCII > characters - but, IMO, if \w can match non-ASCII characters, so should \d. > > > > Abigail > > The unicode character database file UnicodeData.txt contains in fields 6,7 and 8 the value of numeric characters. Could we not use that to numeifiy characters such as Ⅲand Ⅸ so Ⅸ - Ⅳ == 5 John ______________________________________________ This email has been scanned by Netintelligence http://www.netintelligence.com/emailThread Previous | Thread Next