Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from October 2009
2009/10/28 David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>: > In response to Steve Hay's report in > [RT #50922](https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=50922). > > --- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/2202jp.txt | 202 +++++++++++----------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/2202jpx.txt | 202 +++++++++++----------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/2202jpy.txt | 202 +++++++++++----------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/2202jpz.txt | 28 ++-- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/cp1256.txt | 78 +++++----- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/fet_cont.txt | 44 +++--- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/fet_dup.txt | 112 ++++++------ > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/iso6.txt | 78 +++++----- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/koi8r.txt | 102 ++++++------ > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/laozi38.txt | 74 ++++---- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/laozi38b.txt | 74 ++++---- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/laozi38p.pod | 92 +++++----- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/lat1fr.txt | 76 ++++---- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/lat1frim.txt | 72 ++++---- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/nonesuch.txt | 22 ++-- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/pasternak_cp1251.txt | 216 ++++++++++++------------ > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/plain.txt | 40 +++--- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/plain_explicit.txt | 44 +++--- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/plain_latin1.txt | 48 +++--- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/plain_utf8.txt | 48 +++--- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/polish_utf8.txt | 138 ++++++++-------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/s2763_sjis.txt | 96 ++++++------ > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus/thai_iso11.txt | 128 +++++++------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus2/polish_utf8_bom.txt | 134 ++++++++-------- > cpan/Pod-Simple/t/corpus2/polish_utf8_bom2.txt | 134 ++++++++-------- > 25 files changed, 1242 insertions(+), 1242 deletions(-) > [...] Thanks for the quick turnaround on this. However, since there is not yet a new CPAN release, I'm not sure if this should be applied yet or not. What will Porting/Maintainers.pl say? Neither the current 3.09 nor the forthcoming 3.10 would be correct. Also, I'm unable to apply the patch myself anyway. Git sadly doesn't work entirely smoothly on Win32. I have to run any patches through dos2unix before 'git am' will handle them, but doing that presumably renders the changes somewhat ineffective, which could explain why 'git am' won't apply this patch even after dos2unixing it. I also tried once more without dos2unixing it first, but that doesn't work either :-( So hopefully someone else can apply the patch (but possibly not until 3.10 is out?).Thread Previous | Thread Next