On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, demerphq wrote: > And this is why we really really want \w and \s and \d to match the > traditional thing, even if this means requiring people add something > to older scripts to support the legacy behaviour. You cant tell what a > pattern does by looking at it, you have to know the internal bit flags > of the string involved. Just to be sure: \b will continue to be defined based on \w and \W and change its behavior as well, right? I'm only asking because \b is not explicitly listed in this discussion. Cheers, -JanThread Previous | Thread Next