> There are plans for a pragma for other unicode incompatibilities, and a > git branch that includes the beginnings of one: "use legacy". I had > thought that these changes could be controlled by a pragma, and I hope > that it is this one. If the changes will be controlled by a pragma, what's the point of forcing existing code to 'use legacy' rather than making these changes part of 'use 5.12'? We've always had a strong culture of not gratuitously breaking backwards compatibility. This seems like a strange thing to choose to throw that away on. -JesseThread Previous | Thread Next