Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2009
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:21:53AM +0200, Steffen Mueller wrote: > Dear porters, > > what's the policy for dual-lived modules that are maintained primarily > as part of core perl (i.e. Porting/Maintainers gives "UPSTREAM" = > "blead") with respect to bug tracking? In principle, the bugs should be > reported to rt.perl.org, but that doesn't stop users from reporting to > the rt.cpan.org queue. > > Supposing I can't fix all of the bugs (or rather few). Should I post a > notice to the list? > > Should I refile the bugs and close the rt.cpan.org tickets? Personally, I guess I'd like: 1: All the bugs fixed :-) 2: Failing that, the existing bug contents to be migrated to new bugs on rt.perl.org. I don't know if this is automatable for RT currently (or in the near future) 3: The (effectively) duplicate queues on rt.cpan.org to be closed to new bugs, and some way given to redirect people to report bugs via perlbug. Certainly close the queues to new bugs as soon as possible. but that's just a personal opinion, and I don't have time to make any of this happen. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next