On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:35:02PM +0300, Offer Kaye wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:02 PM, chromatic wrote: > > > > Confirmed in blead. This looks like a fencepost error. With the included > > patch, I get instead an error: > > > > Maybe we should add a test for this, perhaps in t/op/sysio.t? I > thought something like the attached patch (not tested). > > Unrelated question - looking at t/op/sysio.t I don't understand, why > doesn't it use Test::More? There's a bootstrapping order on tests. The initial tests run avoid relying on complex constructions such as packages and OO, so that we get clear failure diagnostics if we introduce a bug that makes them fail. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous