Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2009
Hi Zefram! On 25 фев 09 at 12:00, "Zefram" (Zefram ) wrote: Zefram> Dmitry Karasik wrote: >> I think that in future, the syntax for declaring a class in a >> non-import mode would be either >> >> use base qw(:noimport ParentClass); Zefram> I think that's a very bad idea. The "no-import" feature, for Zefram> which "no-import" is a misnomer anyway, is logically independent Zefram> of the class inheriting from another class. It is a feature of Zefram> the present class's own definition, and should be indicated by a Zefram> separate pragma. Perhaps Zefram> use methods; Perhaps "use methods" , I wouldn't mind. As I said before, I'm mostly concerned with the underlying machinery, and the actual UI, well, I only care for it to be practical enough to change affected code fast, and make it a viable standard for future coding. Zefram, you're very welcome to put forward propositions about UI if you find something even better than "use methods". For me "use methods" is good enough, but possibly it isn't for the others. -- Sincerely, Dmitry KarasikThread Previous | Thread Next