On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 09:46:32PM -0700, Tom Christiansen wrote: > Um, Chip, are people *really* claiming that fixing the -i output > flush bug is something that would be "backwards incompatible", > and thus prequire some notice that such a thing is desired?!? Heh, no. We're now discussing a further level of safety: The renaming of finished files to their target names *after* completed output, as opposed to the status quo of renaming first and _then_ writing. -- Chip Salzenberg twitter:chipsalz "UTOPIA PLANITIA IS IN ORBIT is the new HAN SHOT FIRST" - Crisper Than ThouThread Previous | Thread Next