[perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken - nntp.perl.org

Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from November 2008

[perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken

Thread Next

From:

Chip Salzenberg via RT

Date:

November 14, 2008 04:56

Subject:

[perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken

Message ID:

rt-3.6.HEAD-10965-1226626215-1579.969-14-0@perl.org

How about adding leftshift() and rightshift() as functions in a standard
bitvec.pm, rather than fiddling with the meaning of >> and << ?

Thread Next

[perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg via RT

Re: [perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Rafael Garcia-Suarez

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs consideredbroken by Tim Bunce

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Vincent Pit

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Rafael Garcia-Suarez

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Nicholas Clark

Re: [perl #969] [PATCH] Draft: shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg

Re: [perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Chip Salzenberg

Re: [perl #969] shifting of bitvecs considered broken by Ben Morrow

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About