Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2008
Bram wrote: > Citeren Steve Hay <SteveHay@planit.com>: > >> Bram via RT wrote: >>> On Fri Nov 16 06:46:06 2007, stmpeters wrote: >>>> On Thu May 19 03:49:55 2005, shay wrote: >>>>> This is a bug report for perl from steve.hay@uk.radan.com, >>>>> generated with the help of perlbug 1.35 running under perl v5.8.6. >>>>> >>>>> I believe that the following program should print "OK" 5 times >>>>> over, but it prints "NOT OK" from the first line. >>>>> >>>>> print qq[>10\n] =~ />\d+$ \n/ix ? "OK\n" : "NOT OK\n"; >>>>> print qq[>1\n] =~ />\d+$ \n/ix ? "OK\n" : "NOT OK\n"; >>>>> print qq[>10\n] =~ /\d+$ \n/ix ? "OK\n" : "NOT OK\n"; >>>>> print qq[>10\n] =~ />\d\d$ \n/ix ? "OK\n" : "NOT OK\n"; >>>>> print qq[>10\n] =~ />\d+$ \n/x ? "OK\n" : "NOT OK\n"; >>>>> >>>>> I get the same behaviour with 5.6.0 through to 5.8.6 and >>>>> bleadperl, all on Windows XP. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I just ran this with a recent blead and got... >>>> >>>> [steve@sulu ~]$ /tmp/bleadperl/bin/perl5.10.0 rt_35877.t >>>> OK >>>> OK >>>> OK >>>> OK >>>> OK >>>> >>>> Can you a few other people double check just to make sure this >>>> isn't a heisenbug? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Steve Peters >>> >>> I'm not sure if tests for this were added so a patch with the tests >>> of the report is attached. >> >> Are my eyes just glazing over, or have you got this slightly >> different to the original bug report? >> >> Your patch has >> >> />\d+$ \n/ix >10\n >> /\d+$ \n/ix >1\n >> /\d+$ \n/ix >10\n >> />\d\d$ \n/ix >10\n >> />\d+$ \n/x >10\n >> >> but the original bug report had >> >> />\d+$ \n/ix >10\n >> />\d+$ \n/ix >1\n >> /\d+$ \n/ix >10\n >> />\d\d$ \n/ix >10\n >> />\d+$ \n/x >10\n >> >> You seem to have missed a '>' from the second test. >> >> It actually fails either way with maint, and works either way with >> blead, so it probably doesn't matter. I just wondered if there was >> some significance to your change? > > The change was unintended... > > New patch attached. Thanks, applied as #34202.Thread Previous | Thread Next