Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2008
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 17:46:15 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> But you're also comparing 4.2 with 4.0. What's llvm-gcc like against 4.2?
Given that no GCC optimizations are performed by llvm-gcc it doesn't
matter that much, but the results are:
system gcc-4.2 llvmbc
------ ------- ------
arith/mixed 100 82 119
arith/trig 100 88 103
array/copy 100 96 130
array/foreach 100 83 134
array/index 100 96 134
array/pop 100 98 125
array/shift 100 95 130
array/sort-num 100 100 103
array/sort 100 96 109
call/0arg 100 81 148
call/1arg 100 79 133
call/2arg 100 86 133
call/9arg 100 89 132
call/empty 100 67 139
call/fib 100 87 130
call/method 100 86 126
call/wantarray 100 93 125
hash/copy 100 87 112
hash/each 100 97 127
hash/foreach-sort 100 94 106
hash/foreach 100 85 126
hash/get 100 76 83
hash/set 100 82 108
loop/for-c 100 81 95
loop/for-range-const 100 113 118
loop/for-range 100 111 120
loop/getline 100 94 106
loop/while-my 100 82 96
loop/while 100 85 85
re/const 100 98 99
re/w 100 106 117
startup/fewmod 100 102 105
startup/lotsofsub 100 100 103
startup/noprog 100 108 104
string/base64 100 105 115
string/htmlparser 100 90 104
string/index-const 100 99 109
string/index-var 100 84 114
string/ipol 100 86 83
string/tr 100 97 96
AVERAGE 100 92 115
--
Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org>
http://nothingmuch.woobling.org 0xEBD27418
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next