Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package)

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:41:24AM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:49:22PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> >
> >>Minor quibble (I'm way behind on sumamrising)
> >
> >Is there anything we can do to help this?
> 
> I wasn't complaining, and in fact managed to finish the summary tonight. 
> Which is just as well, because I'll be offline until Monday night.
> 
> >(Apart from writing fewer e-mails, of course.)
> 
> Yes, that would be a good idea. Starting from now, you all have an 
> allowance of two messages per week. Use them wisely.

I asked Robert, and he said

    # ezmlm-list /home/perlmail/perl5-porters{,/digest} | wc -l
    485

    Current stats seem to show about 38 messages per day.


Sooooo

If we all send two messages a week, that's 970 in total :-)
Which is only 5 times as much as the current rate.

Nicholas Clark

• [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by ilmari @ vesla . ilmari . org
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method onnon-existing package by David Landgren
• making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfaultwhen calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by David Landgren
• Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by Nicholas Clark