Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfaultwhen calling ->next::method on non-existing package)

Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 02:49:22PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> 
>> Minor quibble (I'm way behind on sumamrising)
> 
> Is there anything we can do to help this?

I wasn't complaining, and in fact managed to finish the summary tonight. 
Which is just as well, because I'll be offline until Monday night.

> (Apart from writing fewer e-mails, of course.)

Yes, that would be a good idea. Starting from now, you all have an 
allowance of two messages per week. Use them wisely.

David

• [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by ilmari @ vesla . ilmari . org
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method onnon-existing package by David Landgren
• making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfaultwhen calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by David Landgren
• Re: making summarising easier (was Re: [perl #51092] [PATCH] Segfault when calling ->next::method on non-existing package) by Nicholas Clark