On 04/12/2007, Robin Barker wrote: > > My firewall (or more accurately, my sysadmin) does not like the > hammering on 172.29.249.249 from the Net::Ping test in > lib/Net/Ping/t/190_alarm.t. > > Other similar Net::Ping tests are skipped unless PERL_TEST_Net_Ping, > can we apply this patch to do the same for lib/Net/Ping/t/190_alarm.t. So, ok, there's a precedent: thanks, applied as #32571. (although I don't like this approach very much -- there ought to be some documentation on this at least.)Thread Previous