On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:36:47 +0100, Andy Armstrong <n@rciss.us> wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2007, at 12:13, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > pc09:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current/t 138 > env HARNESS_TIMER=time ./
> > TEST op/ver.t
> > t/op/ver....ok 12:18:46
>
> Now (as of r736 from http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/trunk) the output
> looks like this:
>
> [12:34] andy $ prove -rb --timer
> [12:34:45] t/000-load..............1/2 # Testing HTML::Tiny 0.905
> [12:34:45] t/000-load..............ok 27 ms
> [12:34:45] t/010-simple............ok 41 ms
> [12:34:46] t/020-coverage..........ok 306 ms
> [12:34:46] t/030-tags..............ok 34 ms
> [12:34:46] t/040-lazy..............ok 31 ms
> [12:34:46] t/050-validate_tag......ok 28 ms
> All tests successful.
> Files=6, Tests=1151, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr 0.04 sys + 0.41
> cusr 0.05 csys = 0.65 CPU)
> Result: PASS
>
> Is that OK?
Yes. much appreciated.
Please also try to make t/TEST in sync with this new feature :)
Maybe even add a comment line in the first 10 lines of t/TEST that
mentions these possibilities
--
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.1 & 10.2, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next