develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2007

Re: Beyond 5.10

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
James Mastros
Date:
July 5, 2007 06:36
Subject:
Re: Beyond 5.10
Message ID:
20070705133623.GA8284@desert-island.me.uk
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I'm not sure if much can be automated. Much that can be has. For example,
> checking that the AUTHORS file is up to date *is* automated:
> 
>     perl Porting/checkAUTHORS.pl --acknowledged AUTHORS Changes
> 
> gives about 60 lines of output. So the program tells me that it's not

Er, why isn't this an actual test?  Then, hopefully, people testing
their patches will say "oh, it makes a test fail", and patch
themselves in.  Smokes will fail, and people will fix it.

Keeping it out of t/ will make it not fail for people who don't know
what they're doing, so perhaps there should be a Configure flag or
just make that test only run on bleed.  OTOH, I'm not sure making it
fail for everybody isn't the right thing to do anyway.

     -=- James Mastros

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About