develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2007

Re: Are PERL_COPY_ON_WRITE smokes useful?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
H.Merijn Brand
Date:
May 2, 2007 04:58
Subject:
Re: Are PERL_COPY_ON_WRITE smokes useful?
Message ID:
20070502135536.43dc9ad0@pc09
On Wed, 2 May 2007 12:42:06 +0100, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:35:34PM +0100, Steve Hay wrote:
> > I'm about to turn threaded builds back on in my smoke configurations now 
> > that they (hopefully) don't hang any more on Win32, but the smokes 
> > really take too long then because there are too many configuration 
> > combinations.
> 
> Threads. Cool.
> 
> > So I'm considering removing PERL_COPY_ON_WRITE from the configurations. 
> > Will anyone miss this? If keeping it would be useful then I can set up a 
> > smoke to exercise it instead of threads, say, once a week.
> 
> No, they aren't useful.
> In fact, I think I'm guilty of not noticing that you were still doing them,

Not only Steve.

> because the symbol became OLD_COPY_ON_WRITE some time ago.

/me hurries to take that out ...

-- 
H.Merijn Brand         Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.9.x   on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.0 & 10.2, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, and Cygwin. http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/            http://www.test-smoke.org
                        http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About