On Monday 11 December 2006 22:03, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:05:46PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > The ticket I filed for it on rt.perl.org was closed, because it's no > > longer present in bleadperl but as I noted there ( > > http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=40995 ), it still > > requires some attention. > > Then please reply to that ticket to re-open it. I did that now, but it didn't seem to be re-opened. Anyway - it's for your consideration now. > Merely sending a message to this list with [BUG] in the subject defeats the > whole point of having a bug tracking system. Well, my original message was about a different (and less serious) bug which I wanted to consult this list about whether it was real. I just mentioned the #40995 bug by the way so everyone will still remember it. Regards, Shlomi Fish --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish shlomif@iglu.org.il Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ Chuck Norris wrote a complete Perl 6 implementation in a day but then destroyed all evidence with his bare hands, so no one will know his secrets.Thread Previous | Thread Next