>>> got in the way. It is possible that the global malloc pool could be used. >>> Well, I committed it as change 27059, so lets see if it works. >> Excellent! Your next task, should you choose to accept it, is to cut >> down the size of the yacc tables... :-) > > I'm not sure if it's possible. And they produce an object file under 12k Hence the :-) > when compiled, so is it worth it? There most be other space hogs easier to > eliminate than them. The yacc tables just were the next largest static data blobs. > Nicholas Clark >Thread Previous | Thread Next