Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2005
Re: sprintf patches
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Dominic Dunlop
Date:
December 10, 2005 13:20
Subject:
Re: sprintf patches
Message ID:
C84DCCCC-7009-4B97-B3E7-6B9B9DAEE6FC@mac.com
On 2005–12–10, at 14:07, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Jarkko tells me that unified diffs aren't yet in POSIX, so context
> diffs are
> likely to be more portable to older versions of patch.
>
> So, here we go again with another attempt...
Following results for Mac OS X 10.4.3 (Darwin 8.3.0)/gcc 4.0.1 with
patch -p1 < sprintf.whatever; Configure -des; make test
perl-5.8.0: patched OK; unrelated compiler error in DB_File; all
tests pass for make minitest
perl-5.8.1: patched OK using sprintf-5.8.2 with offset of -15 in
sv.c, otherwise directly; compiled OK without warnings; all tests pass.
perl-5.8.2: patched OK; compiled OK without warnings; all tests pass
perl-5.8.3: patched OK; compiled OK without warnings; all tests pass
perl-5.8.4-5.8.6: not tested
perl-5.8.7: patched OK; unrelated compiler warning in regcomp.c; all
tests pass
Actually, "all tests pass" is a lie, but I've ignored the known (and
recently "fixed") Mac OS X 10.4.x issue of "lib/
locale...........................FAILED at test 99".
The build errors for 5.8.0 are:
cc -c -pipe -fno-common -no-cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/
local/include -O3 -DVERSION=\"1.804\" -DXS_VERSION=\"1.804\" "-
I../.." DB_File.c
DB_File.xs: In function 'ParseOpenInfo':
DB_File.xs:1370: warning: passing argument 2 of 'RETVAL->dbp->open'
from incompatible pointer type
DB_File.xs:1370: error: incompatible type for argument 4 of 'RETVAL-
>dbp->open'
DB_File.xs:1370: error: too few arguments to function 'RETVAL->dbp-
>open'
make[1]: *** [DB_File.o] Error 1
The warning from regcomp.c for 5.8.7 is:
`sh cflags "optimize='-O3'" regcomp.o` regcomp.c
CCCMD = cc -DPERL_CORE -c -fno-common -DPERL_DARWIN -no-
cpp-precomp -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O3 -Wall
regcomp.c: In function 'S_study_chunk':
regcomp.c:734: warning: comparison is always false due to limited
range of data type
Would it be useful for me to do Mac OS X 10.4.2 and/or gcc 3.3 as
well? Threaded builds? Tomorrow.
--
Dominic Dunlop
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next