develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2005

Re: [perl #34233] Bug in Switch module

Thread Previous
From:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
Date:
February 24, 2005 06:06
Subject:
Re: [perl #34233] Bug in Switch module
Message ID:
20050224140610.GH5708@efn.org
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 11:51:23AM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> FWIW I have far encountered too many problems with Switch, esp in combination
> with dor, to be daring enough to rely on it. I just don't use it anymore.
> 
> > > [Prerequisites on this task being either understanding and time, or just
> > > a lot of time]
> > 
> > I would fall into the requiring "a lot of time" category.
> 
> And I think that next to "time" and "understanding", one certainly needs
> "motivation", something completely absent on this side of the keyboard for
> that module.

If it's the source filter aspect that deters you, note that perltodo says:

=head2 switch ops

The old perltodo notes "Although we have C<Switch.pm> in core, Larry points to
the dormant C<nswitch> and C<cswitch> ops in F<pp.c>; using these opcodes would
be much faster."

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About