Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]]

Stas Bekman wrote:

> I didn't follow whether something has changed, but 20562 is back to 
> work for me. Sreeji K Das, can you please confirm that it works for 
> you too?

Yes something did change - #20479 was retracted.

This fixes my test program (and mod_perl never was broken for me!)

• [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm] by Stas Bekman
• Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm] by Stas Bekman
• Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Steve Hay
• Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Enache Adrian
• Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Stas Bekman
• Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Steve Hay
• Re: Bug in perl@20558? [Was: Re: [Fwd: [MP1.28 + perl maint. 20512] Build failure due to error in Apache/ExtUtils.pm]] by Sreeji K Das