On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 21:57:05 +0200, rgarciasuarez@free.fr wrote: >Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >> The code to return undef in this case looks pretty intentional, but >> since that contradicts both the documentation and common sense, I >> think it should be changed to return 0. > >Agreed -- thanks, applied to blead as #19135 (with the necessary >adjustments). Hmm. Looks like the maint split.t needs to catch up with blead...the #18195 tests are improved in the blead version to actually fail without the fix :)Thread Previous