Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2001
Re: on testing
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
John Peacock
Date:
June 4, 2001 11:06
Subject:
Re: on testing
Message ID:
3B1BCE2D.870F527A@rowman.com
John Peacock wrote:
>
> If ok() were extracted out of the individual scripts, then the default
> behavior could be that all "not ok" messages would always go to STDERR
> as verbose messages (as well as to STDOUT to be counted and tabulated).
> Then the TEST or Test::Harness framework could dump STDERR to file
> (or even feed it to perlbug, should we so decide).
>
OK, replying to my own message. I just looked through Test::Simple and
Test::More and I withdraw all of my suggestions. Mr. Schwern has
already thought through this more than I had realized. I am going to
start rewriting my own modules tests to use these fine modules!
Jarkko - what can I do to convince you to add at least Test::Simple to
the core, if not both? I can promise to rewrite at least some of the
existing core /lib tests to use it once it becomes available (the tests
I get involved with, at least).
humbly
John
--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4720 Boston Way
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next