Front page | perl.p5ee |
Postings from December 2004
Perrin said:
> When we discussed this at The Perl Conference a few years back, it was
> determined that the only thing everyone there really wanted out of it
> was marketing, i.e. they want people to think of Perl as a valid option
> for enterprise work. You are welcome to propose another goal though.
This is my recollection from that discussion as well.
I think where it went next was a discussion of what it would take to
make a marketing case for Perl as being appropriate for enterprise work.
My recollection of this is a bit more vague, but to reconstruct this
as a composite of what was probably said plus my own opinions on the
matter, it came down to two pieces:
1. Marketing qua marketing -- i.e. getting a bazillion dollar budget to
take out glossy ads in CIO Magazine and related. Let me know when
this happens. :-)
2. Building a "P5EE Product" that can be marketed
As for (2.), I my 0-th order approximation of what is needed along these
lines is
* choose a set of CPAN modules that does what is needed (PNATTMBTC)
* fill in the gaps as needed
* subclass to a P5EE namespace
* unify quirks in the calling API (i.e. the P5EE namespace has a
bit of a translation layer to each individual module from a
common-ish API, a la OpenPlugin)
* make sure that the test suite for all the above is complete
* do a license audit of everything here (i.e. probably make sure
that everything is Perl Artistic)
* having an easily-installable bundle, like a PAR
* get a good set of docs both included and online for all this
Cheers,
Richard
Thread Previous