RE: MooseX::FSA::Simple

Front page | perl.moose | Postings from September 2011

Thread Previous | Thread Next

From:

Ian.Docherty

Date:

September 21, 2011 06:14

Subject:

RE: MooseX::FSA::Simple

Message ID:

D1F14D044736774492967B91A7BDE4761E29C149@LONWS2074B10.EUROPE.NOM

> mo wrote:
> The question is, how would someone name his dist who wants to release a
> version of FSA::Role, which uses Role::Basic as Role framework?
>
> I think we need something like Any::Role :-)

So that implies FSA::Role::Moose for my module, which I don't think would satisfy hdp.

If there is an objection about including 'Moose' in the namespace (because it is about how it is implemented, rather than what it *is*) then shouldn't the same argument apply to including 'Role' since this is also about how it is implemented?

FSA::Something, rather than FSA::Role?

I have done a survey of CPAN modules, (I should have done this previously, sorry)

CPAN modules with MooseRole in them (sorry hdp)

POE::Test::Helpers::MooseRole

We also have the 'Role' namespace used for Moose Roles or not Moose Roles as in.

Role::Log::Syslog::Fast
Role::Subsystem
Role::Log::Syslog::Fast

CPAN modules that have 'Role' in their namespace (referring to Moose Roles)

Javascript::Framework::jQuery::Role::Plugin
Antispam::Toolkit::Role::BerkeleyDB

And some with 'Role' that are *not* Moose

Reflex::Role
Class::Role
Chloro::Role::Form

Some CPAN modules I have found that are Moose Roles, but which don't have either Moose or Role in their name are.

CatalystX::DynamicComponent
Nagios::Plugin::OverHTTP::Parser
Simulation::discreteEvent::Recorder
Graphics::Color::Equal
Norma::ORM::Mappable
Data::Serializable.

I think this survey has shown me that every possible way of doing has been done in CPAN. But perhaps the best way is to avoid both 'Moose' and 'Role' in the namespace, but put in the description 'A Moose Role to ...'.

So, that boils down to

FSA::Something

Which to avoid the existing FSA::Rules gives me a bit of a problem. Perhaps

FSA::StateMachine

Sorry for the long post but perhaps some recommendations may come out of this for naming conventions in the future?

Kind regards
Ian

-- 

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential, may contain
proprietary or privileged information and is intended for the named
recipient(s) only. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action
on the basis of information in this e-mail and must delete all copies.
Nomura will not accept responsibility or liability for the accuracy or
completeness of, or the presence of any virus or disabling code in, this
e-mail. If verification is sought please request a hard copy. Any reference
to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only
and subject to formal written confirmation by Nomura. Nomura reserves the
right to monitor e-mail communications through its networks (in accordance
with applicable laws). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by
Nomura by any mistransmission of this e-mail. Any reference to "Nomura" is
a reference to any entity in the Nomura Holdings, Inc. group. Please read
our Electronic Communications Legal Notice which forms part of this e-mail:
http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm

Thread Previous | Thread Next