Front page | perl.moose |
Postings from December 2010
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Stevan Little wrote: > Looks good, however I think MooseX::Depedency is too general a name, how > about MooseX::Types::Dependent::Types? I don't think this is what dependent types means. Also, I'm not sure this has anything to do with types at all. This is really about whether a value is _required_. Maybe MX::Attribute::Dependent or something like that. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/Thread Previous | Thread Next