Hello I thought of making the name IPv6 specific, however, I have plans to introduce IPv4 support in the not too distant future. So I thought leaving it IP agnostic would be best. Do you think this is acceptable? John =============================================== John Jason Brzozowski (CISSP, RHCT) jjmb@jjmb.com (p) 484-994-6787 (f) 610-616-4535 =============================================== On May 9, 2008, at 4:27 AM, brian d foy wrote: > [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see > the "To," "Cc," and "Newsgroups" headers for details. ]] > > In article <200805090436.m494aLsu003162@pause.perl.org>, Perl Authors > Upload Server <upload@pause.perl.org> wrote: > >> The following module was proposed for inclusion in the Module List: >> >> modid: Net::DNS::Utility >> DSLIP: adpOp >> description: Net-DNS-Utility is an IPv6 DNS helper module >> userid: JJMB (John Jason Brzozowski) >> chapterid: 5 (Networking_Devices_IPC) >> communities: > > Should IPv^ be somewhere in the name, or does this do the same job for > IPv4? What sort of help does this provide? > > Thanks, :) > > -- > brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org > archives at http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/modules > please send all messages back to modules@perl.org >Thread Previous | Thread Next