develooper Front page | perl.module.build | Postings from February 2012

Re: Ending Build.PL if there are missing modules

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Adam Kennedy
Date:
February 5, 2012 07:45
Subject:
Re: Ending Build.PL if there are missing modules
Message ID:
CAAVyNAyr_07TGWwpdcf6FdFKbT93EFCmqeoa5Hc1JhjA=sNkSA@mail.gmail.com
I was thinking about dropping anything without a specific numberic
version completely and requiring manual, because I figure the chances
for misidentification is too high (whereas a number will only really
be there after a human has put some specific thought into it).

Adam

On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, David Golden <xdaveg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Adam Kennedy <adam@ali.as> wrote:
>> If the goal is only to pick up versioned dependencies, I'm surprised
>> we even need to bother with that.
>
> It picks up as many "standard" dependencies as it can, but treats
> anything without a version as requesting version 0.
>
> -- David

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About