Front page | perl.module-authors |
Postings from April 2012
Yeah, Any::Tidy seemed to suggest to me "use the best of available tidiers". I'm leaning now towards Devel::TidyAll, with tidyall being the name of the script. On Apr 30, 2012, at 11:17 AM, David Nicol wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jonathan Swartz <swartz@pobox.com> wrote: >> Comments and suggestions for names welcome. Devel::MultiTidy? > > > I like the Any:: name space for things that offer single interfaces to > multiple back-ends. One could argue that Tidying really doesn't fit > there though. And that argument could be countered with hypothetical > examples involving large projects with different styles, enforced by > different tidying engines, for different parts of it, and the desire > for the scripts called at check-in time to run the correct tidying > engine by looking up per-file metadata. > > > > -- > In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", > "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and > "OPTIONAL" are to be interpreted using situational ethics.Thread Previous | Thread Next