Front page | perl.module-authors |
Postings from December 2010
Books of this sort in general are fewer due to the web. Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect -----Original Message----- From: "Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 02:14:47 To: Dave Rolsky<autarch@urth.org>; Lyle<webmaster@cosmicperl.com> Cc: <module-authors@perl.org> Subject: Re: What hurts you the most in Perl? From: "Dave Rolsky" <autarch@urth.org> > We hear the same argument in reverse that people should work on Perl 5 > instead of Perl 6, as if the people who are working on Perl 6 would _of > course_ be working on Perl 5 if 6 didn't exist. There's no reason to think > this is true, and many reasons to think it's not. Many Perl 6 people never > contributed to Perl 5 the way they do with 6. Maybe there are others that said that, but I have said something related and I want to be more clear. I said that because Perl 6 was announced 10 years ago, in the latest years there were very few Perl 5 books published, so I was referring only to the work of creating books. This is true, but I don't know, maybe I am wrong and there are other reasons for which there are fewer Perl books in the last period, not only because the interest for Perl 5 decreased... OctavianThread Previous | Thread Next