develooper Front page | perl.module-authors | Postings from November 2008

Re: The value of threads

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dr.Ruud
Date:
November 1, 2008 17:32
Subject:
Re: The value of threads
Message ID:
20081102003219.29414.qmail@lists.develooper.com
Chris Dolan schreef:
> Dr.Ruud:
>> Gabor Szabo:

>>> I guess we can implement everything with fork but I think -
>>> maybe because of my lack of experience in threads - that it will
>>> be better to use them than to fork.
>>
>> I think it was Randal Schwartz who said something like: If the answer
>> involves threads, then the question was wrong.
>
> Most likely that quote comes from a year when multi-processor systems
> were not ubiquitous.

I remember it in a context of choosing between forks and threads.


> Every UI framework I've ever used was indeed written with a single-
> threaded event loop, but even in an editor it sure is handy to have
> background threads to do asynchronous work (syntax checking,
> rebuilding call graphs, Perl::Critic, etc) without having to
> explicitly chunk the work or coordinate multiple processes.

C<use forks;>
:)

-- 
Affijn, Ruud

"Gewoon is een tijger."


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About