Front page | perl.module-authors |
Postings from October 2007
Re: RFC: relative.pm
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
David Cantrell
Date:
October 8, 2007 06:34
Subject:
Re: RFC: relative.pm
Message ID:
20071008132119.GG13918@bytemark.barnyard.co.uk
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 01:51:21PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> There is already a `lib` pragma; `lib::relative` to me sounds
> like ???does something like `lib`, only relatively,??? which more
> naturally suggests something to do with relative paths and
> `@INC`.
>
> I proposed pkg::relative which Eric Wilhelm liked; no word from
> Sébastien yet though.
I don't recall seeing any mumbling on p5p about this. That would
probably be a good idea, as lower-case module names are traditionally
reserved for the core. It would be an especially good idea if you're
going to mess around under some pre-existing pragma's namespace like
lib::anything would.
--
David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist
All children should be aptitude-tested at an early age and,
if their main or only aptitude is for marketing, drowned.
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next