Front page | perl.ipc.dirqueue |
Postings from March 2007
Re: usage question
Thread Previous
From:
Thomas J Pinkl
Date:
March 5, 2007 09:06
Subject:
Re: usage question
Message ID:
20070305170644.GA2175@gandalf.pinkl.com
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:28:03AM -0500, Thomas J Pinkl wrote:
> Justin, here's a patch which adds an optional "readonly" parameter
> to visit_all_jobs(). If the parameter isn't passed, then it defaults
> to true, thus maintaining backward compatibility. The patch
> includes changes to the POD as well. It's against the current SVN
> source.
Perhaps I whipped this up too quickly. The read-only flag works, as
far as it goes, but jobs are not considered "active" when read-only
is false.
If I understand the code correctly, then I'll also have to do
something to make the job "active" from within visit_all_jobs().
Is that correct?
--
Thomas J. Pinkl | T: 215-442-9300
Senior Systems Architect | 800-444-1427
Health Business Systems, Inc | F: 215-442-7555
An SXC Company |
738 Louis Drive | http://www.hbsrx.com/
Warminster, PA 18974 | http://www.sxc.com/
Thread Previous