Front page | perl.gedcom |
Postings from August 2011
Hi all, No misprint. If you look at the definitions on p.13 of "optional_line_value" and "optional_xref_ID" the delimiter is included there in each case. The document is quite correct, this is how grammars are defined. Otherwise the delimiter would be required before and/or after the tag even if there was no optional field. /mike On 3 Aug 2011, at 06:54, Mikkel Eide Eriksen wrote: > Hi Ron, > > That indeed looks like a typo. In fact, two "delim"s are missing, > and their presence should be dictated by the optional value/xref. > It should be like this, based on how files look: > > level + [delim + optional_xref_ID] + delim + tag + [delim + > optional_line_value] + terminator > > Regards, > Mikkel > > On 03/08/2011, at 06.46, Ron Savage wrote: > >> Hi Folks >> >> In this doc http://wiki.webtrees.net/images/Ged551-5.pdf about 1/2 >> way >> down p 11 we see: >> >> level + delim + [optional_xref_ID] + tag + [optional_line_value] + >> terminator >> >> I assume this is a misprint for: >> >> level + delim + [optional_xref_ID] + tag + delim + >> [optional_line_value] >> + terminator >> >> since otherwise a tag of INDI say could abut a line item of IIIIII. >> >> Or am I missing something? >> >> -- >> Ron Savage >> http://savage.net.au/ >> Ph: 0421 920 622 >> >Thread Previous | Thread Next