develooper Front page | perl.fwp | Postings from July 2006

Re: Naming the @{[]} operator

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jerrad Pierce
Date:
July 11, 2006 19:14
Subject:
Re: Naming the @{[]} operator
Message ID:
200607120214.k6C2EBku027168@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu
Why Perl5's dereferencing is better than Perl6's:
#34370 +(6)- [X]
<tye> and deref'ing is easy to remember because robots, ->[ , use simple
integer indices while samuri, ->{ , have names for everything, and aliens,
->( , use functional programming

  --http://perlmonks.org/?node=tye
-- 
Free map of local environmental resources: http://CambridgeMA.GreenMap.org
--
MOTD on Boomtime, the 46th of Confusion, in the YOLD 3172:
Five to one against and falling ... four to one against and falling ... three to one ... two ... one ... probability factor one to one ... we have normality, I repeat we have normality. Anything you still can't cope with is therefore your own problem. --DNA
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About