Re: Why bother with separate lists?

> I say keep it as one list and have folk learn to use the machinery their 
> mail clients provide them with; that's why mail clients HAVE that 
> machinery.

or, write their own mail client in perl (guilty as charged) ;)




begin-base64 600 signature.gif
R0lGODlhbQAHAIAAAABPo////ywAAAAAbQAHAAACfAxuGAnch+Bibkn7FL1p
XgVl4Ig1jjlZRoqybgun2Cur5uOunq7u/Ipq7WIyIc7XG9JquEgumPzdlhTf
h0O83kDJaXEm8mRHwXKJy5sac7qYOpT+gtv0n+0ujQOfdqh16caWt0foBViH
N1PRMXimiLUGt3ElVimlgbllWAAAOw==
====

• Why bother with separate lists? by Bernie Cosell
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Andrew.Savige
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Stephen Turner
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Andrew.Savige
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Mark Rogaski
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Andrew.Savige
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Ronald J Kimball
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Uri Guttman
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Stephen Turner
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Paul Makepeace
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Brian L. Matthews
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Mark Rogaski
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by byron
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by F . Xavier Noria
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by abigail
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Bernie Cosell
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by abigail
• Re: Why bother with separate lists? by Ronald J Kimball