Front page | perl.dbi.dev |
Postings from February 2012
On 26/02/12 12:27, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:18:56PM -0800, Jonathan Leffler wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:47, Tim Bunce<[1]Tim.Bunce@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> DBI 1.618 installed fine for me on MacOS X 10.7.3 with Perl 5.14.1 > > Great. > >> I'm slightly puzzled by a couple of the tests skipping because 'Not running with SQL::Statement', when >> in fact I have SQL::Statement installed. >> >> t/52dbm_complex.t ............... ok >> t/zvg_52dbm_complex.t ........... ok >> t/zvn_52dbm_complex.t ........... skipped: Not running with SQL::Statement >> t/zvp_52dbm_complex.t ........... ok >> t/zvxgn_52dbm_complex.t ......... skipped: Not running with SQL::Statement >> t/zvxgnp_52dbm_complex.t ........ skipped: Not running with SQL::Statement >> t/zvxgp_52dbm_complex.t ......... ok >> t/zvxnp_52dbm_complex.t ......... skipped: Not running with SQL::Statement >> >> Maybe it is the message that needs tweakiing? > > Yes, they should be changed to "requires SQL::Statement module". > I thought the "Not running with SQL::Statement" meant the test code uses SQL::Statement but the test code was not running with SQL::Statement e.g., t/zvn_52dbm_complex.t uses Nano and zvp* is Pure Perl so they don't use SQL::Statement. For those tests it is irrelevant if you have SQL::Statement or not - no? Martin -- Martin J. Evans Easysoft Limited http://www.easysoft.comThread Previous | Thread Next