Front page | perl.datetime |
Postings from March 2012
On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, Zefram wrote: > Dave Rolsky wrote: >> It's not like maintaining DT::TZ and updating it when there are new >> Olson releases is a big hassle, so I don't mind doing it for a while. > > Yes, that's another issue I was planning to raise. Continued DT:TZ 1.xx > releases would give distros the choice of a lengthy period in which to > switch. There are enough 1.xx version numbers left for another couple > of years. I wasn't planning to continue 1.xx releases after 2.00 is out. I don't think there's much point to doing that. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/Thread Previous