develooper Front page | perl.cpan.testers.discuss | Postings from March 2012

Re: Test::More 1.005000_002 (over)coverage

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Michael G Schwern
Date:
March 9, 2012 18:41
Subject:
Re: Test::More 1.005000_002 (over)coverage
Message ID:
4F5ABF65.2040803@pobox.com
On 2012.2.12 9:48 AM, Barbie wrote:
>> It's the reporting that needs to change.
> 
> I'm not convinced that it does. The analysis may be able to help, but
> the reports themselves are a record of what happened.

I think we're having a violent agreement.  We agree that it's important that
failure reports reach a responsible human, the question is which human?  If I
rephrased to say "who is alerted to a failure needs to change" I think you
would agree?


> This is probably something we can discuss at the QA Hackathon.

Yep, I look forward to it.


-- 
184. When operating a military vehicle I may *not* attempt something
     "I saw in a cartoon".
    -- The 213 Things Skippy Is No Longer Allowed To Do In The U.S. Army
           http://skippyslist.com/list/

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About