Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from August 2000
Bradley M. Kuhn writes: > I think that <bootstrap@perl.org> is still serving a useful > service---namely, it is a place where meta-discussion on the RFC process can > happen. Yes, I was letting it live to see what kind of traffic it got. I've come to realize that those who wanted a meta list were right. > I am all for taking <bootstrap@perl.org> away, but I think it should be > replaced with <perl6-rfc-meta@perl.org> or something of that ilk. Yes, I now want to take down bootstrap and replace it with a new list perl6-meta@perl.org. The name reflects the change of purpose: we've gotten started, this is now a place for ongoing refinement of the process. Should -meta inherit bootstrap's subscription list, or should it be new? I currently think not, because those involved the initial process of bootstrapping may not be those interested in the ongoing meta-discussions. > And, BTW, have you had a chance to look at my proposed changes to > the RFC sample and format? Yes. I'll reply to your latest message in that thread. NatThread Previous | Thread Next