Re: RFCs

On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:10:16AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Chaim Frenkel writes:
> > I move that we create an list (perl6-rfc) that would recieve all RFC's.
> 
> When you have an RFC you think is ready for wider publishing, the
> librarian will
>  (a) assign a number if it doesn't have one
>  (b) put it on the web site
>  (c) mail it to the -announce list
> 
> I'm trying to wake up the old librarian now, and will find another
> if he can't be located :-) 
> 
> I don't think an rfc list is needed.

So the librarian must monitor perl6-all and extract the RFCs from the
uninteresting bits?  I agree that a list isn't needed, but it would be
nice to at least have an alias such that mail to perl6-rfc@perl.org
goes directly to the librarian.  Then we could say that RFCs aren't
"official" until they've been regurgitated from the librarian with a
proper RFC number.

-Scott
-- 
Jonathan Scott Duff
duff@cbi.tamucc.edu

• RFCs by Jonathan Scott Duff
• Re: RFCs by Nathan Torkington
• Re: RFCs by Chaim Frenkel
• Re: RFCs by Nathan Torkington
• Re: RFCs by Bryan C . Warnock
• Re: RFCs by Dan Sugalski
• Re: RFCs by Jonathan Scott Duff