Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 10:57:34AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:44 AM 7/25/00 -0400, Chris Nandor wrote: > >At 14:42 +0100 2000.07.25, Hugo wrote: > > >people realising it before it is too late. I think this is one thing > > >that the voting may have been intended to address - "hey folks, this > > >may be the _last_ chance to make your views known" - but I think it > > >is probably not the best way. If the RFC approach is done right, I > > >think it can solve this problem: for that, I think a) there needs to > > >be a way to say 'notify me when the RFC text changes', and b) the text > > >of the RFC needs to be updated (among other occasions) when consensus > > >starts to emerge but before any final decision is taken. > > > >Excellent ideas. That way people don't have to monitor mailing lists just > >so they can keep an eye out for when something that they know interests > >them is going to come along. > > In which case it might be useful to have some means of automatic > notification when an RFPC (or one of its children) changes. A mutant > mailing list, or website signup thing or something. Perforce can do that automatically. Maybe cvs/sourceforge can as well. Tim.Thread Previous | Thread Next