Front page | perl.bootstrap |
Postings from July 2000
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:40:14PM -0400, jdporter@min.net wrote:
> But I'll concede that a satisfyingly rich language could be done
> in LALR -- perhaps LALR(5)? -- and maybe it would be good in the
> long term for Perl to be so.
If we are imagining hypotheticals, what about recursive decent?
--
May the best description of competition prevail.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)