Front page | perl.books.workers |
Postings from January 2002
January 31, 2002 00:46
Message ID: 3C58E12E.email@example.com
Uri Guttman wrote:
>>>>>>"DR" == Dave Rolsky <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> DR> I was thinking that these could all be just 'categories', in sort of a
> DR> tree system:
> DR> Technical -> Programming -> Perl
> DR> Technical -> Programming -> Regular Expressions
> and which does MRE fall into? that is the problem with trees. multiple
> attributes cover that.
how about these?
(all perl categories) (since we know perl is the main programming intrest..)
(related stuff, basically anything technical thats not directly Perl)
(LOTR, Foundations Edge, whatever)
Using (Intermediate? couldn't decide which was better)
Guru (some stuff, (MRE) might end up in Using *and* Guru?)
Development (couldn't think of better name, for like Mythical Man Month)
Algorithms (need better name for this category definatly)
Other (everything else)
Perl::Learning (would contain most books, also contains subcategory..)
**basically a mirror of using, but only containing the most advanced books??
Python, C, ect ect
Need help flushing this category out, can't think of any subs
category for each OS that perl is ported to..
open for suggestions
Mystery (can we just drop that category?)
Popular (should that be renamed? ^.^)