Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13

On Apr 26, 2006, at 2:38, mock wrote:

> Can't I do an end run around section 13, by picking an alternate  
> license that
> meets 4(c)ii but doesn't have the patent stuff from section 13?   
> For example
> GPL v2.

If anyone did start patent litigation against one of the Perl users  
(and we'd really prefer they don't), and triggered  section 13, then  
their right to redistribute under 4(c)(ii) is revoked along with the  
rest of the license.

You have to have copyright (because you own the package or because  
someone granted rights to you) before you can distribute to anyone.

Allison

• reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by mock
• Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by Allison Randal
• Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by Nicholas Clark
• Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by mock
• Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by Allison Randal
• Re: reconciling 4(c)ii with 13 by Allison Randal